Ribic v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Christina Elise Ribic
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv01570
Filed: September 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Eileen S Willett
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2022 Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christina Elise Ribic: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon OGC on 10/12/2022. (Osterhout, Karl)
November 10, 2022 Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christina Elise Ribic: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Attorney General on 10/11/2022. (Osterhout, Karl)
November 10, 2022 Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christina Elise Ribic: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon U.S. Attorney on 10/11/2022. (Osterhout, Karl)
October 3, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS)
September 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Within 60 days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 15 days after service of Defendant's answering brief. Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with a copy of this Order within 15 days of any appearance. See Order for further information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 9/30/2022. (CLM)
September 29, 2022 Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
September 16, 2022 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S. Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01570-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. (SCA)
September 16, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Christina Elise Ribic. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA)
September 16, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Christina Elise Ribic. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (SCA)
September 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christina Elise Ribic. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA)
September 16, 2022 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Karl E Osterhout on behalf of Plaintiff Christina Elise Ribic. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ribic v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Elise Ribic
Represented By: Elizabeth Ayodele
Represented By: Karl E Osterhout
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?