Ribic v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Christina Elise Ribic |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
2:2022cv01570 |
September 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Eileen S Willett |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christina Elise Ribic: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon OGC on 10/12/2022. (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christina Elise Ribic: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Attorney General on 10/11/2022. (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Christina Elise Ribic: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon U.S. Attorney on 10/11/2022. (Osterhout, Karl) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Within 60 days after the answer is filed, Plaintiff must file an opening brief. Defendant must file an answering brief within 30 days after service of Plaintiff's opening brief. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 15 days after service of Defendant's answering brief. Plaintiff shall serve Defendant with a copy of this Order within 15 days of any appearance. See Order for further information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 9/30/2022. (CLM) |
Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S. Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01570-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached. (SCA) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Christina Elise Ribic. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Christina Elise Ribic. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (SCA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christina Elise Ribic. (Ayodele, Elizabeth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Karl E Osterhout on behalf of Plaintiff Christina Elise Ribic. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ribic v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christina Elise Ribic | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Ayodele |
Represented By: | Karl E Osterhout |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.