Starr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Jacob Starr
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv01578
Filed: September 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Referring Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 11/10/2022. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
November 10, 2022 Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Diane J Humetewa. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-1578-PHX-DJH. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
November 10, 2022 Filing 11 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
November 9, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Becia Franco appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Becia, Franco)
October 4, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (KJ)
October 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver of the summons and complaint.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 09/30/2022. (KJ)
September 19, 2022 Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
September 18, 2022 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michelle H Burns. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01578-PHX-MHB. Magistrate Election form attached. (SCA)
September 18, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Jacob Starr. (Larkin, Robin) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA)
September 18, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jacob Starr. (Larkin, Robin) (SCA)
September 18, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jacob Starr. (Larkin, Robin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Starr v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacob Starr
Represented By: Robin Michelle Larkin
Represented By: Sarah Nicole Fern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Franco Becia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?