Hinkle v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Plaintiff: Susan Marie Hinkle
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Department of Defense and Pinal County Sheriff's Department
Case Number: 2:2022cv01660
Filed: September 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT- Pursuant to the Court's order filed October 27, 2022, Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (CLM)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. #5 ) is denied. The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. The complaint is dismissed, and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/27/2022. (CLM)
October 17, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Susan Marie Hinkle. (2 Pages) (REK)
September 30, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS)
September 30, 2022 Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01660-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS)
September 30, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Susan Marie Hinkle. (BAS)
September 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Susan Marie Hinkle.(BAS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hinkle v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Marie Hinkle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pinal County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?