Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Office of Staff Attorneys et al
Petitioner: Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Respondent: Office of Staff Attorneys and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2022cv01691
Filed: October 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine (PS)
Referring Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2022 Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court's Order filed October 11, 2022, judgment of dismissal is entered. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (WLP)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk of Court must provide Petitioner with a copy of the form recommended by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing an Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Petitioner's two Motions (Docs. #2 and #4 ) are denied as moot. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Court's procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 10/7/2022. (WLP)
October 4, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (REK)
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK)
October 4, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to add Additional Parties by Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. (7 Pages) (REK)
October 4, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE re: Citation by Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. (1 Page) (REK)
October 4, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Records by Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. (1 Page) (REK)
October 4, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson. (5 Pages) (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Office of Staff Attorneys et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Office of Staff Attorneys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?