Bendixen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Kurt Bendixen
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv01726
Filed: October 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION: Justin Martin appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Martin, Justin)
October 31, 2022 Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Kurt Bendixen: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Attorney General. SSA General Counsel, Civil Process Clerk on 10/26/22. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Cho, Young)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on January 6, 2023. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/17/2022. (JAMA)
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY SCHEDULING ORDER issued. See attached Order. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/17/2022. (JAMA)
October 17, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (WLP). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document.
October 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is responsible for service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and may serve the Summons and Complaint by waiver under Rule 4(d). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 10/17/2022. (WLP)
October 11, 2022 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Young Chul Cho on behalf of Plaintiff Kurt Bendixen. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
October 7, 2022 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-1726-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
October 7, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Kurt Bendixen. (Cho, Young) (MYE)
October 7, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Kurt Bendixen. (Cho, Young) (MYE)
October 7, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kurt Bendixen. (Cho, Young) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Certificate of interested parties)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bendixen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kurt Bendixen
Represented By: Young Chul Cho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Justin Lane Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?