Roman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Felipe Nery Roman
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2022cv01746
Filed: October 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Steven P Logan
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2022 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Betty Herrera on behalf of Plaintiff Felipe Nery Roman. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
October 19, 2022 Filing 9 Notice of Mailing (no proof of delivery shown) filed by Felipe Nery Roman: Proof of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon 3 on 10/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Herrera, Betty) Modified on 10/24/2022 (WLP).
October 14, 2022 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(BAS)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER (see attachment for details). Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/13/22. (CLB)
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the summons and complaint. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/13/2022. (CLB)
October 13, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Felipe Nery Roman. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM)
October 13, 2022 Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-1746-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
October 13, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Felipe Nery Roman. (Herrera, Betty) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JAM)
October 13, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Felipe Nery Roman. (Herrera, Betty) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(JAM)
October 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Felipe Nery Roman. (Herrera, Betty) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felipe Nery Roman
Represented By: Betty Herrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?