Lux et al v. Quiktrip Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Johni Lux and Seta Mathew
Defendant: Quiktrip Corporation and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2022cv01754
Filed: October 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 Filing 9 *NOTICE of Attorney Substitution by Abdoukadir Abdul Jaiteh terminating Alex Matthew Romero. (Jaiteh, Abdoukadir) *Modified to correct event and text on 11/21/2022 (REK).
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 6/2/2023. Dispositive motions due by 1/12/2024 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 11/16/22. (MAW)
November 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint Rule 26(f) report (Doc. #6 ), concludes it is unnecessary to hold a Rule 16 Case Management Conference. The Court will separately issue the Case Management Order. Counsel are to note at Item 12 of the Case Management Order that the deadlines are real, and the Court will enforce the deadlines set forth in the Order. The parties should plan their litigation activities accordingly.Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 11/16/22. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
November 14, 2022 Filing 6 *REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Johni Lux, Seta Mathew. (Jaiteh, Abdoukadir) *Modified to add additional filer on 11/15/2022 (REK).
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will issue a scheduling order after receiving the parties' Rule 26(f) report. After reviewing the Rule 26(f) report, the Court will set a case management conference if meeting with the parties appears necessary or helpful. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed no later than November 14, 2022 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 10/14/22. (MAW)
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on January 12, 2023, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 10/14/22. (MAW)
October 13, 2022 Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21202301. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-1754-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
October 13, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Quiktrip Corporation. (Stafford, Karen) (MYE)
October 13, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-051948. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21202301 filed by Quiktrip Corporation. (Stafford, Karen) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A-H, #4 Attachment)(MYE)
October 13, 2022 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons, Complaint, and Certificate of Arbitration upon QuikTrip Corporation on 9/13/2022. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 9/16/2022.) (MYE) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.
October 13, 2022 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Quiktrip Corporation. ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES.*** (MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lux et al v. Quiktrip Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johni Lux
Represented By: Abdoukadir Abdul Jaiteh
Represented By: Alex Matthew Romero
Represented By: Elizabeth Marie Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Seta Mathew
Represented By: Abdoukadir Abdul Jaiteh
Represented By: Alex Matthew Romero
Represented By: Elizabeth Marie Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quiktrip Corporation
Represented By: Karen Christine Stafford
Represented By: Victoria Renee Kelly
Represented By: Andrea M Swan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?