Doe v. Peoria Unified School District et al
| J Doe |
| Peoria Unified School District, Ricky Ordway, Unknown Ordway and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2022cv01756 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Susan R Bolton |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by J Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tonkin, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Ricky Ordway. (WLP) |
| Filing 8 STATUS REPORT regarding Defendant Ordway by J Doe. (Tonkin, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE re: Notice of Related Cases by J Doe . (Tonkin, Timothy) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Case Management Conference is set for December 22, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 502, Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003 [see attached order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 11/22/22. (MAW)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: After review of the docket, the Court notes that service on Defendant Ricky Ordway was made on October 6, 2022. No answer has been filed and no application for entry of default has been made. IT IS ORDERED that counsel for the Plaintiff file a status report within 7 days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter will be dismissed as to defendant Ricky Ordway without further notice 7 days from the date of this Order if counsel fails to file a status report. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 11/22/22. (MAW)
|
| Filing 4 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by J Doe: Affidavit of Service re: Complaint and Summons upon Ricky Ordway on 10/06/2022. (Tonkin, Timothy) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P., that this action shall be dismissed as to Defendants Ricky Ordway and Jane Doe Ordway without further notice after December 19, 2022, unless before then Plaintiff has served Defendants Ricky Ordway and Jane Doe Ordway with the summons and complaint and has filed with the Clerk of the Court proof thereof pursuant to Rule 4(l) or has shown good cause for the failure to timely serve. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 11/22/22. (MAW)
|
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21202051. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Senior Judge Susan R Bolton. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01756-PHX-SRB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-012386. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21202051 filed by Peoria Unified School District. (Hensley, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A through D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Attachment DEF Peoria Unified School District's Answer)(BAC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED***SERVICE EXECUTED: Acceptance of Service re: Summons upon Peoria Unified School District on Signed on 9/27/22. (Entered for case management purposes)(BAC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
| ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED: ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Peoria Unified School District. ENTERED IN DISTRICT COURT FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES***(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
