Hagins et al v. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated
Robert Hagins and Tommie Woodard |
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated |
2:2022cv01835 |
October 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michael T Morrissey |
Roslyn O Silver |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. #16 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiffs' motion to strike (Doc. #19 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (See document for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 5/24/2023. (SLQ) |
Filing 22 *NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. (McKay, Michael) *Modified to correct event and text on 3/30/2023 (REK). |
Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion re: #19 MOTION to Strike filed by Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. (Shingles, Melissa) |
Filing 20 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. (Shingles, Melissa) |
Filing 19 MOTION to Strike by Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McKay, Michael) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re: #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. (McKay, Michael) |
Filing 17 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. (Shingles, Melissa) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Declaration of Wesley J. Stockard, #2 Exhibit Exhibits 1-12 of Declaration)(Shingles, Melissa) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Wesley E Stockard on behalf of Defendant Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Bradley J Crowell on behalf of Defendant Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Rachel P Kaercher on behalf of Defendant Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Stipulation. Defendant shall have through January 9, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 12/14/2022. (RMV) |
Filing 14 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint (Second or Final Request) by Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ogden, Mark) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Ogden on behalf of Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. (Ogden, Mark) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Roslyn O Silver. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-1835-PHX-ROS. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 11 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 9 ORDER: The parties' stipulated motion to extend the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint #8 is granted. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint no later than December 19, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael T Morrissey on 11/21/2022. (REK) |
Filing 8 *STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (First Request) by Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McKay, Michael) *Modified to add additional filer on 11/17/2022 (SST). |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Marc Reed Edelman on behalf of Plaintiffs Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Luis A Cabassa, Amanda Heystek, Brandon J Hill on behalf of Plaintiffs Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 7 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Robert Hagins: Notice of Service re: Summons and Complaint upon Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc on October 27, 2022. (McKay, Michael) |
Filing 6 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Incorporated. (BAC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21239001. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Michael T Morrissey. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-01835-PHX-MTM. Magistrate Election form attached. (BAC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. (McKay, Michael) (BAC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21239001 filed by Robert Hagins, Tommie Woodard. (McKay, Michael) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.