Kurtzman v. Zaner-Bloser Incorporated et al
| Kristen Kurtzman |
| Zaner-Bloser Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2022cv01949 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James A Teilborg |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Service of Discovery filed by Kristen Kurtzman. (Pruitt, Michael) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Kristen Kurtzman. (Pruitt, Michael) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Andrew Christian Smith on behalf of Defendant Zaner-Bloser Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Oliver Daniel Frey on behalf of Defendant Zaner-Bloser Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: IT IS ORDERED setting a Scheduling Conference for 1/18/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 503, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Senior Judge James A Teilborg. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/30/22. (MJW)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Zaner-Bloser Incorporated.(Yee, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 7
STANDARD CIVIL TRACK INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/17/22. (MJW)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Zaner-Bloser Incorporated identifying Corporate Parent Highlights for Children, Inc. for Zaner-Bloser Incorporated. (Yee, Jennifer) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Zaner-Bloser Incorporated. (Yee, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Notice of Removal filed by Zaner-Bloser Incorporated. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet when filing a Removal. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file correct document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MCO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Zaner-Bloser Incorporated. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21316448. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-1949-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-094547. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21316448 filed by Zaner-Bloser Incorporated. (Yee, Jennifer) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
