Vetter v. Old Dominion Freight Line et al
| Dennis Vetter |
| Old Dominion Freight Line, Concentra and Sleep Charge |
| 2:2022cv02006 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Remand re: #8 Order by Maricopa County Superior Court. (SMF) |
Filing 8
ORDER remanding this case to Maricopa County Superior Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to effectuate the remand as soon as practicable and close this matter. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Remand Letter) (WLP)
|
| Filing 7 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line. (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Old Dominion Freight Line. (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Old Dominion Freight Line. (Coulter, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Old Dominion Freight Line. (SCA) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21343682. This case has been assigned to the Honorable John J. Tuchi. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-02006-PHX-JJT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-010353. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21343682 filed by Old Dominion Freight Line. (Coulter, John) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(SCA) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Civil Complaint, Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, and Summons upon Sleep Charge on 10/24/2022. (Original filed in Maricopa Superior County on 11/7/2022)SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Civil Complaint, Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, and Summons upon Old Dominion Freight Line on 10/24/2022. (Original filed in Maricopa Superior County on 11/7/2022)SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service re: Civil Complaint, Plaintiff's Demand for Jury Trial, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration, and Summons upon Concentra on 10/24/2022. (Original filed in Maricopa Superior County on 11/7/2022) (SCA) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
