Paparella v. Plume Design Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Michael Paparella
Defendant: Plume Design Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2022cv02040
Filed: November 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Deborah M Fine
Referring Judge: John J Tuchi
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Anthony E Guzman, II on behalf of Defendant Plume Design Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP)
January 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Charles O Thompson on behalf of Defendant Plume Design Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case filed by Plume Design Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Attachment DECLARATION OF ANTHONY GUZMAN)(Quincy, Stephanie)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Daniel S Latter on behalf of Plaintiff Michael Paparella. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case filed by Michael Paparella. (Latter, Daniel)
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on opposing counsel a responsive memorandum to Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, transfer Under Federal Comity, Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(B)(4), and 28 U.S.C. 1404(A) (Doc. #5 ). no later than January 10, 2023. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/20/2022. (JAMA)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge John T Tuchi. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-2040-PHX-JJT. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
December 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
December 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 *MOTION to Dismiss Case, MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case by Plume Design Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, Part 1, #3 Exhibit 2, Part 2, #4 Exhibit 2, Part 3, #5 Exhibit 2, Part 4, #6 Exhibit 2, Part 5, #7 Exhibit 3, #8 Exhibit 4, #9 Exhibit 5, #10 Exhibit 6)(Quincy, Stephanie). *Added MOTION to Change Venue/Transfer Case on 12/8/2022 (REK).
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAC)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21360292. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Deborah M Fine. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-02040-PHX-DMF. Magistrate Election form attached.PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (BAC)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Plume Design Incorporated. (Quincy, Stephanie) (BAC)
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-053290. Filing fee received: $402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21360292 filed by Plume Design Incorporated. (Quincy, Stephanie) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G, #2 Exhibit H-I, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(BAC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paparella v. Plume Design Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Paparella
Represented By: Daniel S Latter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Plume Design Incorporated
Represented By: Stephanie J Quincy
Represented By: Charles O Thompson
Represented By: Anthony E Guzman, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?