Sonlight v. Staskiewicz et al
Sonlight |
Benjamin Staskiewicz, John S Bennett and Robert Allan |
2:2022cv02043 |
December 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
John Z Boyle |
Dominic W Lanza |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Dominic W Lanza. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-22-2043-PHX-DWL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 16 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 14 ORDER- Plaintiff shall have until 2/24/23 to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (doc. #13 ). Defendant shall file any reply within 14 days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. The Motion shall be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 1/23/23. (SMF) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Benjamin Staskiewicz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Riether, Robert) |
Filing 12 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Filing 11 Magistrate Election Form Deadline. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Riether on behalf of Benjamin Staskiewicz. (Riether, Robert) |
Filing 9 ORDER- Plaintiff shall have until 2/24/23 to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #8 ). Defendant shall file any reply within 14 days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. The Motion shall be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 1/18/23. (SMF) |
Filing 8 *MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by John S Bennett. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-9) (King, Ian). *Modified to add motion part on 1/19/2023 (DXD). |
Filing 7 Agreement to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Party agrees to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SMF) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Robert Allan, John S Bennett, Benjamin Staskiewicz. (SMF) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200003388. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV22-2043-PHX-JZB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(SMF) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Sonlight. (SMF) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 200003388 filed by Sonlight. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(SMF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.