Andrews v. Lasota et al
| David Andrews |
| A Douglas Lasota, Michael McVey and Eric Yuva |
| 2:2022cv02082 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John Z Boyle (PS) |
| John Z Boyle |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: On or before 1/20/2023, Plaintiff shall either file a notice of change of address with this Court, listing a valid mailing address for Plaintiff, or show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's rules. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 12/28/2022. (CLM)
|
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to David Andrews. Reason for return: Return to Sender, insufficient address. Document number #7 . (CLM) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to David Andrews. Reason for return: not deliverable as addressed. Document number [2,3]. (CLM) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to David Andrews. Reason for return: not deliverable as addressed. Document number #5 . (CLM) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff shall have until 1/2/2023 to file a response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6 ). Defendant shall file any reply within 7 days from the date Plaintiff's response is filed. The Motion shall be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Z Boyle on 12/19/2022. (CLM)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by A Douglas Lasota, Michael McVey, Eric Yuva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H)(Jellison, James) *Modified to correct Motion type and Add MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim on 12/19/2022 (CLM). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER : Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by Rule 81(c)(2), and the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter is assigned to the standard track pursuant to Rule 16.2(b)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 12/14/2022. (CLM)
|
| Filing 4 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by A Douglas Lasota, Michael McVey, Eric Yuva. (Jellison, James) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Pinal County Superior Court, case number 1100CV202201981. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21392288 filed by Eric Yuva, Michael McVey, A Douglas Lasota. (Jellison, James) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
