Rodela v. Stewart et al
David Anthony Rodela |
Hannah Stewart, Darlene Waldrom and Kerri Gilbertson |
2:2022cv02108 |
December 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Susan M Brnovich |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss Case by David Anthony Rodela. (KJ) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Kerri Gilbertson, Hannah Stewart, Darlene Waldrom. (Rhodes, Julie) |
|
|
Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (WLP) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kerri Gilbertson, Hannah Stewart, Darlene Waldrom to Plaintiff at Customer Service counter. (WLP) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by David Anthony Rodela. (WLP) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200003660. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Susan M Brnovich. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-2108-PHX-SMB. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (WLP) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 200003660 filed by David Anthony Rodela.(WLP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.