Smith #213317 v. Unknown Parties
Plaintiff: Floyd Smith
Defendant: Unknown Party, Unknow Party and Unknown Parties
Case Number: 2:2022cv02113
Filed: December 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles (PS)
Referring Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Second Amended Complaint by Floyd Smith. (2 Pages) (SMF)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Floyd Smith. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/18/23. (SMF)
January 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER- Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $22.97. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk shall, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/18/23. (SMF)
December 15, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE: This case is subject to electronic filing. Please review the attached documents. (SMF)
December 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SMF)
December 14, 2022 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Floyd Smith. (1 Page) (SMF)
December 14, 2022 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Floyd Smith. (2 Pages) (SMF)
December 14, 2022 Filing 1 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Floyd Smith. (7 Pages)(SMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith #213317 v. Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Floyd Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknow Party
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?