Gastelum v. Smiths Garreison SW
| Jorge Gastelum |
| Smiths Garreison SW and Smiths Garreison |
| 2:2022cv02158 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Susan M Brnovich |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Smiths Garreison filed by Jorge Gastelum.(KJ) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Plaintiffs Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim with 30 days leave to amend. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal without prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 1/10/23. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jorge Gastelum. (5 pages) (BAS) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Jorge Gastelum. (23 pages)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
