Scott v. Yuma Elementary School District No. 1
Plaintiff: Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott
Defendant: Yuma Elementary School District No. 1
Case Number: 2:2022cv02166
Filed: December 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Dominic W Lanza
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Yuma Elementary School District No. 1 filed by Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott. (Attachments: #1 Attachment EEOC Notice of Right to Sue)(Scott, Nona Bolanile Fayola)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting the Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint by February 3, 2023. The amended complaint must adhere to LRCiv 7.1. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint by February 3, 2023, the Clerk of Court shall terminate the action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting the motion to allow electronic filing by a party appearing without an attorney (Doc. #4 ) in this case only. See document for complete details. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 1/5/2023. (WLP)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (REK)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-02166-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (REK)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION to Allow Electronic Filing by a Party Appearing Without an Attorney by Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott. (7 Pages) (REK)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott. (REK)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott. (5 Pages) (REK)
December 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott. (28 Pages) (REK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Yuma Elementary School District No. 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nona Bolanile Fayola Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yuma Elementary School District No. 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?