Quiel v. United States of America et al
Michael L Quiel |
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Cheryl Bradley, Monica Edelstein, David Stockwell, Christopher Rusch and Unknown Parties |
2:2022cv02175 |
December 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Douglas L Rayes |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 *SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Michael L Quiel: Certified Mail Receipt re: Summons and Complaint upon the U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona on 01/10/2023. (Parker, Robert) *Modified to list the party that was served on 2/23/2023 (REK). |
Filing 10 *NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading pursuant to LRCiv 15.1(b) by Michael L Quiel. (Parker, Robert) *Modified to correct event and text on 1/3/2023 (REK). |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #6 Amended Complaint filed by Michael L Quiel. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 15.1(b) - The amending party must file a separate notice of filing the amended pleading. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please use event Notice of Filing - Amended Pleading (LRCiv 15.1(b)) and attach a copy of the amended pleading that indicates in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text that was deleted and underlining the text that was added. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to U.S. Attorney. (BAS) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Submitted by Michael L Quiel. (Parker, Robert) |
Filing 6 *First AMENDED COMPLAINT against United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Cheryl Bradley, Monica Edelstein, David Stockwell, Christopher Rusch, Unknown Parties filed by Michael L Quiel.(Parker, Robert) *Modified to list correct defendants on 12/29/2022 (REK). |
Filing 5 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 12/27/2022. (RMV) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cheryl Bradley, Monica Edelstein, Christopher Rusch, David Stockwell, United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21437508. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-22-2175-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Michael L Quiel. (Parker, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21437508 filed by Michael L Quiel. (Parker, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Robert Roosevelt Parker, Jr on behalf of Plaintiff Michael L Quiel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.