Reed v. Gordwin
Yvonne Reed |
Ursula Gordwin and Gordwin Law PLLC |
2:2023cv00064 |
January 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Steven P Logan |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 11 MOTION to Reopen Case by Yvonne Reed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(KJ) |
|
Filing 9 NOTICE by Yvonne Reed. (KJ) |
Filing 8 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Yvonne Reed. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
|
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ursula Gordwin, Gordwin Law, PLLC filed by Yvonne Reed. (KJ) |
|
|
Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (KJ) |
Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200004185. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: 2:23-cv-64. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (KJ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 200004185 filed by Yvonne Reed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(KJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.