Cline v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Rebecca Cline
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2023cv00236
Filed: February 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Douglas L Rayes
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Michael Marriott appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Marriott, Michael)
February 7, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP)
February 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SCHEDULING ORDER - See document for complete deadlines and details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/7/2023. (WLP)
February 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's application to proceed without prepaying fees and costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to notify the Commissioner of the commencement of this action by transmitting a Notice of Electronic Filing to the appropriate office within the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Additionally, if the complaint was not filed electronically, the Clerk of the Court is directed to notify the plaintiff of the transmission. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 2/7/2023. (WLP)
February 4, 2023 Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-236-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
February 4, 2023 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rebecca Cline. (Larkin, Robin) (MYE)
February 4, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rebecca Cline. (Larkin, Robin) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cline v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Cline
Represented By: Sarah Nicole Fern
Represented By: Robin Michelle Larkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Michael Marriott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?