Kuczynski v. Davod et al
| Richard Thomas Kuczynski |
| Lillian Davod, Unknown Gordon, Unknown Johnson, Centurion, L Gordon and T Johnson |
| 2:2023cv00274 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| John J Tuchi |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and $52.00 administrative fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and a certified six-month trust account statement (or institutional equivalent). If Plaintiff fails to do so within 30 days, the Clerk must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/22/2023. (KJ)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (KJ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Richard Thomas Kuczynski. (3 pages) (KJ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Richard Thomas Kuczynski. (4 pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (KJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
