Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Matthew John Arnold
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2023cv00306
Filed: February 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall answer by May 22, 2023. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/18/2023. (WLP)
April 14, 2023 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint UNOPPOSED by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Triesch, Heidi)
March 6, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Heidi Triesch appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Triesch, Heidi)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the briefing schedule for this case shall be as stated in the Supplemental Rules. See document for complete deadlines and details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/27/2023. (WLP)
February 28, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (WLP)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/27/2023. (WLP)
February 20, 2023 Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable James A Teilborg. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-306-PHX-JAT. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
February 20, 2023 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Matthew John Arnold. (Fern, Sarah) (JAM)
February 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Matthew John Arnold. (Fern, Sarah) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew John Arnold
Represented By: Sarah Nicole Fern
Represented By: Robin Michelle Larkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Heidi Triesch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?