Muhit v. Mayorkas et al
| Omer Faruk Muhit |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and Merrick B Garland |
| 2:2023cv00335 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE Re Transfer of 1:22-CV-3710-ABJ from the District of Columbia to the District of Arizona. New Case Number: CV-23-00335-PHX-GMS. (MAP) |
| Filing 7 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:22-cv-03710 . Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received |
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) and with the parties' consent, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to transfer #6 is GRANTED. The Court finds it is in the interest of justice to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, where plaintiff resides. The Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Defendants' response to the complaint in the action is due within twenty-one days of the date this case appears on the docket of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Transfer due by 2/18/2023. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Amy Berman Jackson on 02/08/2023. (lcabj2) [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.]
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION to Transfer Case to the District of Arizona by MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bardo, John). Added MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer on 2/6/2023 (znmw). [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.] |
| Filing 5 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. UR M. JADDOU served on 12/19/2022; TED H. KIM served on 12/19/2022; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 12/19/2022 (Ahmed, Sadaf) [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.] |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 12/19/2022. (Ahmed, Sadaf) [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.] |
| Filing 3 RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 12/14/2022. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 2/12/2023. (Ahmed, Sadaf) [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.] |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS (5) Issued Electronically as to MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, and U.S. Attorney (Attachment: #1 Notice and Consent)(zsl) [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MERRICK B. GARLAND, UR M. JADDOU, TED H. KIM, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ADCDC-9729728) filed by OMER FARUK MUHIT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT B, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT C, #4 Summons SUMMON FOR U.S. ATTORNEY, #5 Summons SUMMONS FOR ATT. GENERAL, #6 Summons SUMMONS FOR ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, #7 Summons SUMMONS FOR UR M. JADDOU, #8 Summons SUMMONS FOR TED H. KIM, #9 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(Ahmed, Sadaf) [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.] |
| Case Assigned to Judge Amy Berman Jackson. (zsl) [Transferred from dcd on 2/24/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
