Carlson v. Rice et al
Ryan Carlson |
John Rice, Eric Wu, Adam Bain, Cipora Herman, Jonathan Jaffe, Pueo Keffer, Jason Kilar, Glenn Solomon, Carrie Wheeler and Opendoor Technologies Incorporated |
Seth Van Dorn |
2:2023cv00367 |
March 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
G Murray Snow |
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MOTION to Transfer Related Case by Seth Van Dorn, Ryan Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order To Transfer Pursuant to LRCiv 42.1) (Associated Cases: CV-23-00367-PHX-GMS,CV-23-00455-PHX-DMF) (Barrett, Gerald) |
Filing 11 ORDER - Before the Court is a Stipulation Regarding Re-Assignment (Doc. #10 ). The Stipulation is denied for the parties' failure to comply with LRCiv 42.1. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 4/24/23. (SMF) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Regarding Re-Assignment by Ryan Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Re-Assignment)(Barrett, Gerald) |
Remark: Out of state attorneys Gregory Michael Egleston and Thomas James McKenna terminated as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Out of state attorneys Barry Gainey, David Silva, and Robert Schupler terminated as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting (8) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 2:23-cv-00367-GMS. The Related Derivative Actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes, including pre-trial proceedings and trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), under Case No. Case No.: 2:23-cv-00367-GMS (the "Consolidated Derivative Action"). Every pleading filed in the Consolidated Derivative Action, or in any separate action included herein, must bear the above caption. Rigrodsky Law, P.A. and Gainey McKenna & Egleston are hereby designated as Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel for the conduct of the Consolidated Derivative Action. Plaintiffs shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, file a consolidated complaint, which will be the operative complaint in the Consolidated Derivative Action. Defendants need not respond to the prior complaints filed in the Related Derivative Actions. See Order for further details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/20/23. (Associated Cases: 2:23-cv-00367-GMS, 2:23-cv-00455-DMF) (SMF) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Ryan Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order) (Associated Cases: CV-23-367-PHX-GMS, CV-23-455-PHX-DMF) (NOTE: This entry was re-docketed for statistical purposes using the proper LR 42 Motion to Consolidate Event)(SMF) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION to Consolidate Related Cases and Appoint Lead Counsel by Ryan Carlson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order)(Barrett, Gerald) |
Remark: Out of state attorney Seth D Rigrodsky terminated as counsel of record for noncompliance with admission procedures; party or parties represented by other admitted counsel. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Timothy J MacFall on behalf of Plaintiff Ryan Carlson. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 6 ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff serve a copy of this Order upon Defendants and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/2/2023. (KFZ) |
Filing 5 ORDER/NOTICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m). IT IS ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on May 31, 2023. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 3/2/2023. (KFZ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Adam Bain, Cipora Herman, Jonathan Jaffe, Pueo Keffer, Jason Kilar, Opendoor Technologies Incorporated, John Rice, Glenn Solomon, Carrie Wheeler, Eric Wu. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(MCO). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21651973. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-0367-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MCO) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ryan Carlson. (Barrett, Gerald) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons)(MCO) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21651973 filed by Ryan Carlson. (Barrett, Gerald) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Verification - Carlson)(MCO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.