Abeyta et al v. Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated et al
| Beatriz Abeyta and Robert Abeyta |
| Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2023cv00395 |
| March 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| John J Tuchi |
| Eileen S Willett |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 5/15/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 505, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge John J Tuchi. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 4/7/2023. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/31/2023. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge John J Tuchi for all further proceedings. Judge Steven P Logan no longer assigned to case. All future pleadings and papers submitted for filing shall bear the following complete case number: CV-23-00395-PHX-JJT. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/22/23. (MJW)
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge Steven P Logan. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-23-00395-PHX-SPL. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21672180. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Eileen S Willett. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-395-PHX-ESW. Magistrate Election form attached.PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (ARC) |
| Filing 4 DEFENDANT'S DEMAND for Jury Trial by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. (Collins, Jefferson) (ARC) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 First Amended Complaint by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. (Collins, Jefferson) (ARC) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. (Collins, Jefferson) (ARC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2022-007426. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21672180 filed by Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated. (Collins, Jefferson) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(ARC) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons, First Amended Complaint, Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Home Depot U.S.A. Incorporated on 9/8/2022. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 9/9/2022) (ARC) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
