Ronet v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
| Jean-Pierre Ronet |
| Arizona Department of Public Safety, Heston Silbert, Steven Morrison, Avondale Police Department, Michigan State Police, Marci Kelley, Florida, State of, B Johnson, Hillsborough County Sheriffs Office, Tampa Police Department and United States District Court |
| 2:2023cv00453 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Eileen S Willett (PS) |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed April 14, 2023, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed. (SMF) |
Filing 4
ORDER - The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed as duplicative and frivolous, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 4/14/23. (SMF)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SMF) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jean-Pierre Ronet. (6 Pages) (SMF) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Jean-Pierre Ronet. (10 Pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SMF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
