Dee Jones v. Thornell et al
Petitioner: Darrick Dee Jones
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2023cv00513
Filed: March 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: James F Metcalf (PS)
Referring Judge: Susan R Bolton
2 Judge: James F Metcalf
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Casey Douglas Ball on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Ryan Thornell. (Ball, Casey)
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER - All motions to amend, motions to supplement, motions to stay, motions for evidentiary hearing, motions to expand the record, and the like, seeking to expand the petition, or the record herein, must be filed within 28 days of the service of Respondents' answer to the Petition. Any reply in support of the Petition must be filed within 35 days of the service of Respondents' answer to the Petition. All exhibits to the answer must be individually and serially labeled. Electronically filed exhibits must be electronically filed in the same order as they are denominated. Any allegations of procedural default or application of an independent and adequate state ground must include an indication of the specific state rule(s) and/or authorities alleged to bar the affected claim(s). Any copies of filings for Magistrate Judge Metcalf provided pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5.4 must be forwarded c/o Office of Clerk of Court, U.S. District Court District of Arizona, 401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, AZ 85003. See Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge James F Metcalf on 5/11/23. (SMF)
May 11, 2023 Filing 7 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 05/08/2023. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim)
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254) - The Clerk shall serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail. Within 2 business days, the Attorney General's Office will acknowledge receipt of the Petition and the Court's Order and within 5 business days will either file a notice of appearance on behalf of Respondents or will notify the Court of the names of the Respondents on whose behalf the Arizona Attorney General's Office will not accept service of process. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 5/8/23. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(SMF)
April 25, 2023 Filing 5 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 200006057. PAID IN FULL. (BAS)
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. If Petitioner fails to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk shall enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Petitioner and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. The Clerk shall mail Petitioner a court-approved form for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas). Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 3/31/23. (SMF)
March 27, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SMF)
March 27, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE re: Filing Fee by Darrick Dee Jones. (1 Page) (SMF)
March 27, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Darrick Dee Jones. (11 Pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dee Jones v. Thornell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darrick Dee Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ryan Thornell
Represented By: Casey Douglas Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Casey Douglas Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?