McCormick v. Multi State Lottery Association et al
| Mark McCormick |
| Arizona Lottery, California Lottery, Florida Lottery, Joe's Service Station, Planta Queen Restaurant, Carroll & Company, Maricopa, County of, Multi State Lottery and Multi State Lottery Association |
| 2:2023cv00525 |
| March 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Other Fraud |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER that, although Mr. McCormick's application to proceed without prepaying fees and costs #2 is GRANTED, his complaint #1 is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 3/31/2023. (REK)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L. Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV23-00525-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mark McCormick. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mark McCormick.(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
