Bryant v. City of Phoenix Police Department et al
| Kenneth Bryant |
| City of Phoenix Police Department, Phoenix, City of and Kate Gallego |
| 2:2023cv00528 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles (PS) |
| Camille D Bibles |
| James A Teilborg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Summary Disposition by City of Phoenix Police Department, Kate Gallego, Phoenix, City of. (Torrilhon, Victoria) |
Filing 8
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion at ECF No. #4 is granted and the motion to dismiss at ECF No. #5 is deemed timely filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 4/14/2023. (WLP)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date this order is docketed to file a response to the motion to dismiss at Doc. #5 . Defendants shall file a reply within 15 days from the date Plaintiff's response to the motion is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 4/6/2023. (KJ)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/6/2023. (KJ)
|
| Filing 5 EX PARTE MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by City of Phoenix Police Department, Kate Gallego, Phoenix, City of. (Torrilhon, Victoria) |
| Filing 4 *First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response re: #1 Complaint by City of Phoenix Police Department, Kate Gallego, Phoenix, City of. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Torrilhon, Victoria) *Modified to correct event and link on 4/3/2023 (KJ). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MCO) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (MCO) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-002635. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21750867 filed by Kate Gallego, Phoenix, City of, City of Phoenix Police Department. (Torrilhon, Victoria) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(MCO) |
| ***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVER*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Affidavit of Service re: Summons/Civil Complaint/Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration/Plaintiff Demand for Jury Trial upon Mrs. Dent, Legal Liaison on behalf of City of Phoenix Police Department on 2/27/2023. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 3/1/2023.) Affidavit of Service re: Summons/Civil Complaint/Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration/Plaintiff Demand for Jury Trial upon Mrs. Dent, Legal Liaison on behalf of the City of Phoenix on 2/27/2023. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 3/1/2023.) Affidavit of Service re: Summons/Civil Complaint/Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration/Plaintiff Demand for Jury Trial upon Mrs. Dent, Legal Liaison on behalf of Kate Gallego, Mayor, City of Phoenix on 2/27/2023. (Original filed in Maricopa County Superior Court on 3/1/2023.) (MCO) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
