Jones v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
| Ecila Jones |
| CR Bard Incorporated, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2023cv00535 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Personal Injury: Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ecila Jones: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 4/3/2023 to C.R. Bard, Inc. . (Brenes, Troy) |
| Filing 9 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Ecila Jones: Rule 4 Waiver of Service of Summons. Waiver sent on 4/3/2023 to Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. . (Brenes, Troy) |
Filing 8
PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on June 29, 2023, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/4/23. (MAW)
|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Troy Alexander Brenes on behalf of Plaintiff Ecila Jones. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Sarah Demers on behalf of Plaintiff Ecila Jones. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 *Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Ecila Jones. (Brenes, Troy) *Modified to correct event and text on 4/3/2023 (REK). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, CR Bard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SCA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Ecila Jones. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please refile corrected document. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SCA) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Ecila Jones. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SCA) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21756261. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W. Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-00535-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Ecila Jones. (Brenes, Troy) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21756261 filed by Ecila Jones. (Brenes, Troy) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
