Connor v. Arizona State University et al
| Courtney Connor |
| Arizona State University and Arizona Board of Regents |
| 2:2023cv00550 |
| April 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf |
| John J Tuchi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motions to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) and motions to strike pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) are discouraged if the defect that would be the subject of the motion can be cured by filing an amended pleading. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/8/2023. (JAMA)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate any or all Defendants in this matter, without further notice, that have not been served within the time required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) on July 5, 2023. (See attached Order). Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 5/8/2023. (JAMA)
|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge John J Tuchi. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-23-00550-PHX-JJT. FURTHER ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for May 15, 2023 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
| Filing 8 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER that Courtney Connor show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 5/15/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP)
|
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Robert Christopher Ekstrand on behalf of Plaintiff Courtney Connor. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Complaint filed by Courtney Connor. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REM) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REM). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-21764403. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James F Metcalf. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-00550-PHX-JFM. Magistrate Election form attached. (REM) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Courtney Connor. (Ekstrand, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Summons)(REM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-21764403 filed by Courtney Connor. (Ekstrand, Robert) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(REM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
