Hamphill-Wooten v. Thornell et al
Petitioner: Byron Trenell Hamphill-Wooten
Respondent: Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2023cv00567
Filed: April 3, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Camille D Bibles (PS)
Referring Judge: Camille D Bibles
2 Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - The Motion at ECF No. #6 is granted. Accordingly, Respondents shall have until 6/16/23, to answer the 2254 petition at ECF No. #1 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 5/16/23. (SMF)
May 15, 2023 Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Ryan Thornell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)(Ambri, Mariette)
April 12, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Mariette Susan Spence Ambri on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Ryan Thornell. (Ambri, Mariette)
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254)- Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Ground Three of the Petition (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed. The Clerk shall serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1 ) and this Order on the Respondents and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Camille D. Bibles pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See Order for further details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 4/7/23. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(SMF)
April 3, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (SMF)
April 3, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Byron Trenell Hamphill-Wooten. (2 Pages) (SMF)
April 3, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 200005734 filed by Byron Trenell Hamphill-Wooten. (28 Pages) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SMF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hamphill-Wooten v. Thornell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Byron Trenell Hamphill-Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ryan Thornell
Represented By: Mariette Susan Spence Ambri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Represented By: Mariette Susan Spence Ambri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?