Mwamba v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
Eureka Kabeya Mwamba |
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CoreCivic, Arizona State University, United States Department of Homeland Security and Unknown Parties |
2:2023cv00649 |
April 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Camille D Bibles (PS) |
Douglas L Rayes |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and denying without prejudice #5 Motion for Release or Bond Hearing. The Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim with 30 days leave to file and amended complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/31/23. (DXD) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Release or MOTION for Bond Hearing by Eureka Kabeya Mwamba. (14 Pages) (SMF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Eureka Kabeya Mwamba re: #1 Complaint (6 pages). (DXD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Eureka Kabeya Mwamba (2 pages). (DXD) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Eureka Kabeya Mwamba (68 pages). (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.