Warren v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Dajun K Warren |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| 2:2023cv00650 |
| April 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Certified Copy of Administrative Transcript filed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Transcript Index, #3 Admin Process, #4 Payment, #5 Jurisdictional Part 1, #6 Jurisdictional Part 2, #7 Non Disability, #8 Disability, #9 Medical Records Part 1, #10 Medical Records Part 2, #11 Medical Records Part 3)(Edwards, L) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: L. Jamala Edwards appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Edwards, L) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
Filing 6
SOCIAL SECURITY PRELIMINARY ORDER [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/19/23. (MAW)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis without prepayment of costs or fees or the necessity of giving security therefor. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 4/19/23. (MAW)
|
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W. Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-00650-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Dajun K Warren. (Goodman, Jodiane) (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(SCA) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dajun K Warren. (Goodman, Jodiane) (SCA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Dajun K Warren. (Goodman, Jodiane) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Warren v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dajun K Warren | |
| Represented By: | Jodiane Goodman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | L Jamala Edwards |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
