Scott v. Unknown Parties
| Gene Edward Scott, II |
| Unknown Parties |
| 2:2023cv00701 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Camille D Bibles |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 USCA Case Number re: #12 Notice of Appeal. Case number 23-15889, Ninth Circuit. (Distributed by the 9th Circuit) (BAC) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals by Gene Edward Scott, II. (Attachments: #1 IFP)(BAC) |
Filing 11
ORDER that Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration at ECF No. #10 , which presents no statements and no argument but instead is merely a case caption stating "Motion to Reconsider to 42(2) & Rule 56 Dismissal But Without Fault to Either Party," is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 6/7/2023. (WLP)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration to 42(2) & Rule 56 Dismissal but Without Fault to Either Party re: 8 Minute Order by Gene Edward Scott, II. (2 pages) (WLP) |
| Filing 9 Service documents received: Chicago Judge Service Form. (Attachments: #1 New York Judge Service Form)(WLP) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to #6 the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, Civil Case Terminated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER that Plaintiff's pleading at ECF No. #6 shall be deemed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and the Clerk of the Court is directed to proceed accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Camille D Bibles on 5/05/2023. (REK)
|
| Filing 6 *Construed as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal per #7 Order*MOTION to Voluntarily Dismiss Case by Gene Edward Scott, II. (1 page) (WLP) Modified on 5/5/2023 (REK). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (WLP) |
| Filing 4 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Camille D Bibles. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-701-PHX-CDB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Instructions)(WLP) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Gene Edward Scott, II. (WLP) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document (Civil Cover Sheet) re: #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Gene Edward Scott, II. (WLP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gene Edward Scott, II.(WLP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Unknown Parties | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gene Edward Scott, II | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unknown Parties | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
