Alarcon v. Thornell et al
| Javier Velazquez Alarcon |
| Ryan Thornell and Mark Brnovich |
| 2:2023cv00821 |
| May 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michelle H Burns (PS) |
| Alison S Bachus |
| Roslyn O Silver |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254),, by Mark Brnovich, Ryan Thornell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)(Damstra, Kathryn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Ann Damstra on behalf of Mark Brnovich, Ryan Thornell. (Damstra, Kathryn) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 05/31/2023. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim) |
Filing 5
Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254) - The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. #1 ), the Memorandum in Support (Doc. #3 ), and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail pursuant to Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, and the Memorandum of Understanding between the United States District Clerk of Court for the District of Arizona and the Arizona Attorney General's Office. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Respondents must not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. See document for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 5/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(WLP)
|
| Filing 4 *MINUTE ORDER: This matter has been randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alison S. Bachus (PS) as the referral judge. All future filings shall reflect the following complete case number: CV-23-00821-PHX-ROS (ASB). This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (NKS) *Modified to correct docket text and regenerate NEF on 5/31/2023 (NKS). |
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Petitioner Javier Velazquez Alarcon. (WLP) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (BAC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $5.00, receipt number AAZDC-21896862 filed by Javier Velazquez Alarcon. (Tait, Ryan) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Memo Decision 4/14/20, #2 Exhibit SCT PFR, #3 Exhibit ME Dismiss PCR, #4 Exhibit Memo Decision 11/8/22, #5 Attachment Memorandum in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(BAC) Attachment #5 (Memorandum) was intended to be a separate filing per call from attorneys. It was refiled at #3 as such on 5/12/2023 (WLP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
