Roberts v. LabCorp
Plaintiff: David Roberts
Defendant: LabCorp
Case Number: 2:2023cv00908
Filed: May 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: Diane J Humetewa
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2023 Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - pursuant to the Court's Order filed 7/21/2023, judgment of dismissal is entered. Plaintiff to take nothing, and the complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice. (KJ)
July 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: Defendant LabCorp's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #10 ) is GRANTED under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(i). The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to enter judgment accordingly. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 7/25/2023, at 11:30 AM is VACATED as moot. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 7/20/2023. (KJ)
July 18, 2023 Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by LabCorp. (Crowson, Walker)
July 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause in writing on for before July 20, 2023, explaining why Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #10 ) should not be granted and this action dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to timely respond under Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 7/13/2023. (LFIG)
June 20, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by LabCorp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A, #2 Exhibit Exh. B)(Crowson, Walker)
June 9, 2023 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for John E Phillips, Jr on behalf of Defendant LabCorp. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER setting a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 7/25/2023 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 605, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge Diane J Humetewa. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/31/2023. (See Order for details.) (LFIG)
May 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: the Motion (Doc. #6 ) is granted. Defendant shall have until June 20, 2023 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/24/2023. (KJ)
May 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: This matter having recently come before this Court, the parties are advised of the following preliminary policies and procedures that will govern these proceedings. See Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 5/24/2023. (KJ)
May 25, 2023 Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Andrea W Paris on behalf of Defendant LabCorp. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS)
May 24, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (First Request) by LabCorp. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Crowson, Walker)
May 23, 2023 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by LabCorp. (Crowson, Walker)
May 23, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to LabCorp. (MYE)
May 23, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (MYE)
May 23, 2023 Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number BAZDC-21936128. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Diane J Humetewa. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-908-PHX-DJH. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE)
May 23, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Yuma County Superior Court, case number S1400CV202300226. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number BAZDC-21936128 filed by LabCorp. (Crowson, Walker) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MYE)
May 23, 2023 ***STATE COURT RECORD RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED : Affidavit of Service by Certified Mail re: Civil Complaint, Summons, Compulsory Arbitration, Demand for Jury Trial upon LabCorp on 5/3/2023. (Original filed in Yuma County Superior Court on 5/8/2023.) (MYE) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. LabCorp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LabCorp
Represented By: Andrea W Paris
Represented By: Caitlin White
Represented By: John E Phillips, Jr.
Represented By: Walker Field Crowson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?