Williams v. Experian Information Solutions Incorporated
| Erica Williams |
| Experian Information Solutions Incorporated |
| 2:2023cv01076 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Dominic W Lanza |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 16(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court will issue a scheduling order after receiving the parties' Rule 26(f) report. After reviewing the Rule 26(f) report, the Court will set a case management conference if meeting with the parties appears necessary or helpful. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: The parties are directed to meet, confer, and develop a Rule 26(f) Joint Case Management Report, which must be filed no later than August 31, 2023 [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 8/3/23. (MAW)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Experian Information Solutions Incorporated.(Sanchez, Dayme) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Experian Information Solutions Incorporated. (Sanchez, Dayme) |
| Remark: Pro hac vice motion(s) granted for Dayme Sanchez on behalf of Defendant Experian Information Solutions Incorporated. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAS) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (Doc. #7 ) is granted. The deadline for Defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to August 1, 2023. Ordered by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 7/3/23. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAW)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Experian Information Solutions Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dessaules, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 SERVICE EXECUTED filed by Erica Williams: Return of Service re: Summons upon Experian Information Solutions Incorporated on 06/17/2023. (Findsen, Beth) Modified to reflect party served on 6/22/2023 (WLP). |
|
Filing 5
PRELIMINARY ORDER: IT IS ORDERED: 1. That Plaintiff(s) must promptly serve a copy of this Order on Defendant(s) and file a notice of service with the Clerk of Court; 2. That, unless the Court orders otherwise, on September 12, 2023, the Clerk of Court shall terminate without further notice any Defendant in this action that has not been served pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/13/23. (MAW)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions Incorporated. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Submitted by Erica Williams. (Findsen, Beth) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22001425. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-1076-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (MYE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22001425 filed by Erica Williams. (Findsen, Beth) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MYE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
