Gonzalez v. Penzone et al
| Roberto Gonzalez |
| Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2023cv01122 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| James F Metcalf (PS) |
| Steven P Logan |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed June 29, 2023, Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is denied. Petitioner to take nothing and this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. (DXD) |
Filing 5
ORDER - Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. #1 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 6/28/23. (DXD)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (REK) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Roberto Gonzalez. (1 Page) (REK) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Roberto Gonzalez. (3 Pages) (REK) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Roberto Gonzalez. (12 Pages and Envelope) (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (REK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
