Perez v. Ocotillo Healthcare Incorporated
| Aleyda Perez |
| Ocotillo Healthcare Incorporated doing business as Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation |
| 2:2023cv01223 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Douglas L Rayes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER - The parties' stipulation is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case, whereupon, by proper motion of the prevailing party at arbitration, it may be reopened or dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/1/23. (SMF)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION by Aleyda Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION, #2 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER TO STIPULATION TO STAY PENDING ARBITRATION)(Watts, Shayna) |
| Filing 6 *SERVICE EXECUTED : Certificate of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Order upon Ocotillo Healthcare Incorporated on 7/12/23 and NOTICE of Service of Discovery by Aleyda Perez . (Watts, Shayna) *Modified to correct event on 7/24/2023 (SMF). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 7/5/2023. (RMV)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ocotillo Healthcare Incorporated. (ARC). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AZDC-22066140. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Douglas L Rayes. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-1223-PHX-DLR. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Aleyda Perez. (Watts, Shayna) (ARC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AZDC-22066140 filed by Aleyda Perez. (Watts, Shayna) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perez v. Ocotillo Healthcare Incorporated | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aleyda Perez | |
| Represented By: | Shayna Fernandez Watts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ocotillo Healthcare Incorporated doing business as Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
