Ross et al v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company et al
Jonathan Ross and Justin Kingsolver |
Travelers Personal Insurance Company and Unknown Parties |
2:2023cv01435 |
July 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
David G Campbell |
James F Metcalf |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal - Breach of Contract - Insurance |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Senior Judge David G. Campbell: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 9/14/2023. Case status and scheduling are discussed. Separate case management order to issue. APPEARANCES: Ryan Sandstrom for Plaintiffs. Sean Carroll and Daniel Thiel for Defendants. (Court Reporter Scott Coniam.) Hearing held 3:27 PM to 3:37 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (LMR) |
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Justin Kingsolver, Jonathan Ross. (Sandstrom, Ryan) |
![]() |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Travelers Personal Insurance Company.(Carroll, Sean) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge David G Campbell. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-23-1435-PHX-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 7 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
![]() |
Filing 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT by Travelers Personal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Carroll, Sean) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22125496. This case has been assigned to the Honorable James F Metcalf. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-1435-PHX-JFM.Magistrate Election form attached. PLEASE NOTE: Plaintiff(s) and defendants that have already appeared in this case are required to file the attached Magistrate Election form within FOURTEEN (14) days of this filing. Please read attached instructions. (MCO) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Travelers Personal Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Standard Fire Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Travelers Property Casualty Corporation, Corporate Parent Travelers Companies Incorporated, Corporate Parent Travelers Insurance Group Holdings Incorporated for Travelers Personal Insurance Company. (Carroll, Sean) (MCO) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-092815. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22125496 iled by Travelers Personal Insurance Company. (Carroll, Sean) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit)(MCO) |
***STATE COURT RECORDS RECEIVED*** SERVICE EXECUTED: Declaration of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Certificate of Compulsory Arbitration upon Desiree Vaga (Authorized) on behalf of Department of Insurance on 6/21/2023. (Original filed on 6/22/2023 in Maricopa County Superior Court) (MCO) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.