Parker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Marie Parker |
Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
2:2023cv01872 |
September 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Dominic W Lanza |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT - Pursuant to the Court's Order filed October 31, 2023, the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security reversed in favor of Plaintiff, and this case is remanded to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings consistent with the Order. (DXD) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion to Remand. This action is reversed and remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), consistent with the terms of the stipulation. The Clerk shall enter a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 10/30/23. (DXD) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration Unopposed by Commissioner of Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Darcher, Edmund) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Edmund Darcher appearing for Commissioner of Social Security Administration. . (Darcher, Edmund) |
Filing 4 SOCIAL SECURITY PRELIMINARY ORDER - (See document for complete details). Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 9/7/2023. (SLQ) |
Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22273651. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Dominic W Lanza. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-1872-PHX-DWL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (ARC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (ARC) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22273651 filed by Marie Parker. (Linerud, Rory) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Marie Parker | |
Represented By: | Rory J Linerud |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
Represented By: | Edmund Jack Darcher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.