King v. Thornell et al
Frederick King, Jr. |
Ryan Thornell and Kristin Mayes |
2:2023cv01962 |
September 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Michael T Morrissey (PS) |
Steven P Logan |
Michael T Morrissey |
Prisoner: Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca Jones on behalf of Ryan Thornell. (Jones, Rebecca) |
Filing 8 Notice of Receipt of Electronic Service of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Arizona Attorney General on 11/03/2023. The Attorney General's Office will file a Notice of Appearance within five (5) business days that identifies the respondents that are represented or, in the alternative, will notify the Court if the Attorney General is not able to accept service for and/or represent any of the named respondents. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (Nielsen, Jim) |
Filing 7 Arizona Attorney General Service Order (2254): The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition #1 and this Order on the Respondent(s) and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona by electronic mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michael T. Morrissey pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/02/2023. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition, #2 Exhibit 1-10, #3 Exhibit 11-12, #4 Exhibit 13-14, #5 Exhibit 15-16) (REK) |
Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) Civil Cover Sheet by Petitioner Frederick King, Jr. (Sullivan, Courtney) *Modified linkage on 9/20/2023 (DXD). |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Frederick King, Jr.. Pursuant to the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual Section II(B), attorneys are required to submit the automated Civil Cover Sheet when filing a new case. FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: Please file a Civil Cover Sheet. Deficiency must be corrected within one business day of this notice. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) filed by Frederick King, Jr. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(3) - Party names must be capitalized using proper upper and lower case type. Document not in compliance with LRCiv 7.1(a)(1) - Forms of Papers. Please note for future filings; Attorney filing information must be typed in upper left corner. No further action is required. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JAM) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (JAM) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254) by Petitioner Frederick King, Jr. (Sullivan, Courtney) (JAM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State/2254). Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number AAZDC-22310538 filed by Frederick King, Jr. (Sullivan, Courtney) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-10, #2 Exhibit 11-12, #3 Exhibit 13-14, #4 Exhibit 15-16)(JAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.