Saini et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B Garland |
| Sumit Saini and Amanpreet Kaur Saini |
| 2:2023cv02037 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Steven P Logan |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE re: Proof of Delivery. (SMF) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE re: Proof of Delivery. (SMF) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE re: Proof of Delivery. (SMF) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE re: Proof of Delivery. (SMF) |
| Filing 13 SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Exhibits upon US Attorney Arizona on 9/29/23. (SMF) |
| Filing 12 SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Exhibits upon Merrick B Garland on 10/2/23. (SMF) |
| Filing 11 SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Exhibits upon Ur M Jaddou on 9/29/23. (SMF) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE EXECUTED : Proof of Service re: Summons/Complaint/Exhibits upon Alejandro Mayorkas on 9/29/23. (SMF) |
Filing 9
ORDER that motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) are discouraged if the defect can be cured by filing an amended pleading. The parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of such motions to determine whether it can be avoided. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff(s) serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file a notice of service. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 9/27/23. (MJW)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR REMOVAL FROM NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Amanpreet Kaur Saini, Sumit Saini. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
| Filing 7 Summons Reissued in person at Customer Service Intake Counter as to Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas on 09/28/2023.. (HLA). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Merrick B Garland, Ur M Jaddou, and Alejandro Mayorkas. (BAS). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (BAS) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200008542. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Steven P. Logan. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV23-02037-PHX-SPL. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (BAS) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST BY NON-PRISONER PRO SE PARTY FOR ELECTRONIC NOTICING filed by Sumit Saini. Pro se parties must promptly notify the Clerks Office, in writing, if there is a change in designated e-mail address or mailing address. (BAS) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Amanpreet Kaur Saini and Sumit Saini. (BAS) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT for WRIT OF MANDAMUS and Violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 200008542 filed by Sumit Saini and Amanpreet Kaur Saini. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
