United States of America v. Smart Women's Choice Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Smart Women's Choice Incorporated and Jennifer A Richard
Case Number: 2:2023cv02112
Filed: October 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Injunction
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER AND CONSENT DECREE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION granting #3 Motion to Enter Consent Decree. Upon entry of this Decree, Defendants and each and all of their directors, officers, agents, representatives, employees, attorneys, successors, assigns, and any and all persons or entities in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this Decree by personal service or otherwise, are permanently restrained and enjoined, under 21 U.S.C. 332(a) and the inherent equitable authority of this Court, from directly or indirectly manufacturing, preparing, processing, packing, repacking, receiving, labeling, holding, and/or distributing any drug at or from Defendants' Facilities as discussed herein. This Court retains jurisdiction of this action and the parties thereto for the purpose of enforcing and modifying this Decree and for the purpose of granting such additional relief as may be necessary or appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/14/23. (DXD)
October 18, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William H Breier on behalf of Jennifer A Richard, Smart Women's Choice Incorporated. (Breier, William)
October 16, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn Rice on behalf of United States of America. (Rice, Carolyn)
October 12, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to Enter Consent Decree by United States of America. (Rice, Carolyn) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(JAM)
October 12, 2023 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-2112-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (JAM)
October 12, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by United States of America. (Rice, Carolyn) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Smart Women's Choice Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Carolyn Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smart Women's Choice Incorporated
Represented By: William H Breier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer A Richard
Represented By: William H Breier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?