Danduprolu v. Mayorkas et al
| Venkata Govinda Varma Danduprolu |
| Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Felicia Escobar Carrillo and John Ramirez |
| 2:2023cv02157 |
| October 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Michael T Morrissey |
| Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SMF) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to John Ramirez. (SMF). *** IMPORTANT: When printing the summons, select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" for the seal to appear on the document. |
| Filing 3 Filing fee paid, receipt number 200008847. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Michael T Morrissey. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV23-02157-PHX-MTM. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 MAG 25 Consent Form)(SMF) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Submitted by Venkata Govinda Varma Danduprolu. (SMF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number 200008847 filed by Venkata Govinda Varma Danduprolu.(SMF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
