Batanovic v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Dino Batanovic |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
2:2023cv02207 |
October 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Alison S Bachus |
G Murray Snow |
Immigration: Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.7(b), a request has been received for a random reassignment of this case to a District Judge. FURTHER ORDERED Case reassigned by random draw to Judge G Murray Snow. All further pleadings/papers should now list the following COMPLETE case number: CV-23-2207-PHX-GMS. FURTHER ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause Hearing scheduled for December 12, 2023 is hereby VACATED. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 9 Party Elects Assignment of Case to District Judge Jurisdiction. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying Plaintiff's construed motion for a hearing or assignment to the expedited track for case management under Rule 16.2 of the Local Rules #6 . Plaintiff is reminded that future filings shall comply with the Local Rules. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED affirming the Court's Order to Show Cause dated November 27, 2023 #5 . See Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alison S Bachus on 12/11/2023. (CSL) |
Filing 6 MOTION for an Expedited Hearing by Dino Batanovic. (SMF) |
Filing 5 ORDER that Dino Batanovic show cause for failure to comply with LRCiv 3.7(b) before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. Show Cause Hearing set for 12/18/2023 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Chief Judge G Murray Snow. (Attachments: #1 Instructions, #2 Consent Form)(MAP) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (HLA) |
Filing 3 This case has been assigned to the Honorable Alison S Bachus. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-2207-PHX-ASB. Magistrate Election form attached. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form Instructions)(HLA) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dino Batanovic. (HLA) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for WRIT OF MANDAMUS filed by Dino Batanovic.(HLA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Batanovic v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dino Batanovic | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.