Complot v. Truist Bank
| Oliver Complot |
| Truist Bank |
| Corina Tolamaa |
| 2:2023cv02266 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| G Murray Snow |
| Personal Property: Truth in Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Movant Corina Tolamaa. (WLP) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #10 Order to Show Cause by Plaintiff Oliver Complot. (WLP) |
Filing 10
ORDER that Plaintiff Oliver Complot show cause no later than December 8, 2023, as to why he has standing for bringing this case on behalf of Corina Tolamaa. "While a non-attorney may appear pro se on his own behalf, '[h]e has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.'" (quoting C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987)). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Supplement Claim (Doc. #8 ).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED there shall be no further filings by Plaintiff other than a response to this Order to Show Cause and until such time as there is further order issued by this Court. Signed by Chief Judge G Murray Snow on 11/28/2023. (WLP)
|
| Filing 9 LODGED Proposed Supplement Claim re: #8 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemt Claim. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion or Stipulation for Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Oliver Complot. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4) (DXD) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemt Claim by Oliver Complot. (DXD) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion re: #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Oliver Complot. (DXD) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim by Truist Bank. (Repka, Ashley) Modified to correct event on 11/7/2023 (WLP). |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Truist Bank identifying Corporate Parent Truist Financial Corporation for Truist Bank. (Repka, Ashley) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 14 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set as to Truist Bank. (SCA) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANT re informational documents attached: (1) Notice to Self-Represented Litigant, (2) Federal Court Self-Service Clinic Flyer, (3) Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2, and (4) Notice and Request re Electronic Noticing. (SCA) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee paid, receipt number AAZDC-22439712. This case has been assigned to the Honorable G Murray Snow. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV-23-02266-PHX-GMS. Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge to Exercise Jurisdiction form attached. (SCA) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Maricopa County Superior Court, case number CV2023-015415. Filing fee received: $ 402.00, receipt number AAZDC-22439712 filed by Truist Bank. (Repka, Ashley) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(SCA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
