Madrigal v. Penzone et al
Mallela Madrigal |
Paul Penzone and Clint Hickman |
2:2023cv02272 |
November 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Alison S Bachus (PS) |
James A Teilborg |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Mallela Madrigal. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/06/2023. (REK) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiffs Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is granted. The Complaint #1 is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and deny any pending unrelated motions as moot. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/06/2023. (REK) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT (DXD) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Mallela Madrigal (1 page). (DXD) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Mallela Madrigal (3 pages). (DXD) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Mallela Madrigal (7 pages). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DXD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.